Kilo Code vs Cursor：怎么选？
下面把两款工具的关键信息逐项放在一起对照。 两者同属「AI 编程」分类，属于直接竞品。
📊 参数逐项对照
| 对比项 | Kilo Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| 价格模式 | 免费 | 免费 |
| 来源地区 | 🌍 国外 | 🌍 国外 |
| 所属分类 | AI 编程 | AI 编程 |
| 用户评分 | 暂无评分 | 暂无评分 |
| 热度（浏览量） | 121 | 115 |
| 付费说明 | — | — |
| 替代品 | Kilo Code 的替代品 → | Cursor 的替代品 → |
📖 详细介绍
Kilo Code 是什么？
关于 Kilo Code
Kilo Code is where engineering work starts. KiloClaw is where your OpenClaw agent keeps working after the IDE closes: always-on, hosted, and connected to your channels.
Pick Efficient, Frontier, Balanced, or Free. Auto Model handles the routing behind the scenes, using the right model strategy for your budget and the work at hand.
GLM-5.2 from Z.ai has been one of the most talked-about open-weight models since it launched, and we have made it our daily driver to see how it holds up.
Cursor 是什么？
关于 Cursor
“Cursor quickly grew from hundreds to thousands of extremely enthusiastic Stripe employees. We spend more on R&D and software creation than any other undertaking, and there's significant economic outcomes when making that process more efficient.”
“The most useful AI tool that I currently pay for, hands down, is Cursor. It's fast, autocompletes when and where you need it to, handles brackets properly, sensible keyboard shortcuts, bring-your-own-model... everything is well put together.”
“The best LLM applications have an autonomy slider: you control how much independence to give the AI. In Cursor, you can do Tab completion, Cmd+K for targeted edits, or you can let it rip with the full autonomy agentic version.”